Was Jesus an Aryan (White)? – The Great Jewish Mask – August 1909 – The Open Court

[One of my followers sent me this fascinating note. He had indeed found something I was looking for. Here’s his note. You can download the PDF as I did. This relates to the Temple of Solomon article which I had found as a result of my diggings into the sources for The Great Jewish Mask.

I should add, that IF Jesus existed, then the answer to what race he might have been might be as per below. But keep in mind that Jesus might never have actually existed. Do not take it as “a scientific fact” that Jesus actually existed as a real person. That is a whole different line of questioning.

In The Great Jewish Mask I had mentioned The Temple of Solomon and the article that mentioned Jewish art and how absolutely pathetic it was. It was in this magazine that I found the exact quote, word for word that was used in The Great Jewish Mask in 1936.

In this magazine you’ll also find the full copy of The Temple of Solomon article. This magazine has many articles about Christianity, the Bible and even evidence of human sacrifice found in Israel.

I should mention that Christians do some things without really questioning it carefully. There is for example the time when they have bread and wine in Church and when they “drink the blood of Christ” and “eat” of his body. These may be references to human sacrifice and cannibalism that has found its way into the Christianity and yet Christians never ask themselves why they are “drinking the blood of Christ”.

But when I found this magazine I saw that it also had mentioned this article about Jesus being an Aryan however in the copy I had, I did not have this section. So one of my followers found it! Here it is. The conclusion of those who are interested in the science of religion and what they concluded in 1909 about Jesus’s race is based on what was known about the area he was born in. Jan]

Received on: 2017-12-29 :-


Just finished listening to your four part series, The Great Jewish Masque. I enjoyed it very much. Thank you for all of the hard work and effort you put into your videos and web sites. I think it was in part four of the series, you referenced an article from a 1909 issue of the the magazine, The Open Court. The article was entitled, The Temple of Solomon, by Phillips Osgood. As a side remark you mentioned an article title in that same issue that was listed in the table of contents, titled, Was Jesus an Aryan? and you expressed your desire to read that article but your copy of The Open Court only included the front cover and The Temple of Solomon article. If you are interested, I found a pdf copy of that issue of the magazine at archive.org that includes the article about Jesus. The link is https://archive.org/details/opencourt_aug1909caru. It’s a very short article consisting of only three paragraphs. Hope that helps a little.


Here, from page 504 of the PDF is the article.

Prof. Paul Haupt informs us that in the Nciie Revue for October, 1908,
an article appeared by A.Wirth, entitled “War Christus ein Arier?”—the same
subject as the article of Professor Haupt in the April Open Court. Professor
Harnack comments on it in a subsequent number of the same periodical saying,
“Had Jesus not been a Jew, his Jewish antagonists would certainly not
have ignored the fact. Whether, however, he was an Aryan in the sense that
Treitschke, Rietschl, Leibniz, etc., are ‘Slavs,’ that is, whether there were
several drops of Aryan blood in him, is no longer to be determined and in my
opinion without interest.”
It is a strange coincidence that this same topic has been broached almost
simultaneously on both sides of the Atlantic. Though Professor Wirth’s
article appeared before Professor Haupt’s, we may state that Professor Haupt
has utilized his article several times as a lecture, first in August 1908, and it
had been announced for the American Oriental Society, which convened in
April 1908.
In our opinion, there can be no question but Jesus was a Galilean by birth.
The story of his birth in Bethlehem is conceded by higher critics to be a later
invention. The Galileans were fanatical Jews according to their religion, but
they were a mixed race, and we will grant to Professor Haupt that Galilee
has been peopled by immigrants of Aryan descent. Granting the argument
we are, however, not prepared to say that Jesus was an Aryan. First we know
that the Aryan immigrants were not pure Aryan but, like the Persians and
even more than they, were considerably mixed with Semitic blood, for their
ancestors had been living among Semites for centuries; and in addition we
know that many Syrian and Phoenicians, and remnants of the aboriginal population
were living in Galilee. All we can say is that Jesus was a Galilean, and
the Galileans were a people of mixed blood.

[The above images of Fake Jesus and Real Jesus come from a modern scientific study of what Jesus would have looked like, based on what we know.

So in conclusion of the author above, if Jesus existed then he would have had a bit of Aryan blood in him, but he could not have been a pure Aryan (white). So by South African standards Jesus would have been some type of coloured.

Christian Identity Christians have their reasons for believing that Jesus was 100% white. Jan]



8 thoughts on “Was Jesus an Aryan (White)? – The Great Jewish Mask – August 1909 – The Open Court

  • 16th November 2018 at 11:14 pm

    Another article on Jesus by Dr. Oliver “A Jesus who Was A Christ”:


    This concerns one “Jesus ben Pandera”.

    You can find more information on “Jesus” at the National Vanguard site search engine,
    by entering the search terms REVILO OLIVER JESUS

    and you will get a post graduate course in the “Jesus” of biblical note. Also the INSTAURATION and LIBERTY BELL archives will keep you busy for months. Most of these articles list scholarly sources, and Dr. Oliver was a renowned scholar and linguist himself.

  • 5th June 2018 at 12:09 am

    Brilliant scholar Professor Revilo P. Oliver has a great discussion about “Jesus”, and true historians note that there were at least 5 to 7 Jesus’ at the same location and time. It’s available on the National Vanguard website, and it may also be in an audio file. I think it was also published in the American Mercury and the Liberty Bell publications. Take your pick, but he sure wasn’t white.
    Jews must laugh themselves silly at just how the goyim fell for it. They had me fooled for a while, but I’m just a dumb goy.

  • 22nd February 2018 at 1:49 pm

    Jan, you question whether Jesus existed as an earthling. You caution us to think carefully about the things we do. That is all good and well. We SHOULD be cautious and we SHOULD think critically, however…unless you do the same you cannot make any valuable conclusion as far as faith goes.
    The author of above states that Galileans were of mixed blood. No, they were Judeans who moved to the regions of Galilee due to the strong Edomite presence in Judea. The area where you found people of mixed blood were in Samaria, and that, only in the cities and not in the rural areas.
    History and logic goes hand in hand as you know. Having read the Bible through from start to finish several times, and applying logic and critical thinking, and taking extra biblical history and facts into consideration, I have come to the sound conclusion that purity of blood is of the essence where the people of God is concerned, and Jesus being the King of the christian nations could be nothing else but pure white.
    I am glad that you mention Christian Identity. I hope more people will make an effort to read up about this group, since I found that they have delved much deeper into credible study material than any other christian group.
    Yours sincerely.

  • 20th February 2018 at 7:22 am

    Pontius Pilate wrote a letter to Tiberius concerning Jesus Christ. Pilate described the looks of Jesus Christ. His writings can be taken serious as the Romans took everything to book. Bearing in mind that the case of semitism is false. Shem or Sem was the son of Noah, so what. That makes Ishmael, son of Abraam also a semite. The battle is between Jacob (Israel) and Esau – the House of Israel and the House of Edom. Jews are Edomites, even the jewish encyclopedia states that. Jesus Christ was not a jew or an edomite. Herod was an Edomite. Read the writings of Benjamin Freedman.

    • 6th June 2018 at 10:20 pm

      Where’s the letter of Pontius Pilate? It must have a name and be somewhere on the Internet where some academic has studied it.
      Please give me a link to it.

      • 24th July 2018 at 3:18 pm

        There appears to be an English translation here: http://www.thenazareneway.com/likeness_of_our_saviour.htm

        To quote: “This is a reprinting of a letter from Pontius Pilate to Tiberius Caesar describing the physical appearance of Jesus. Copies are in the Congressional Library in Washington, D.C.”

        • 31st July 2018 at 12:07 pm

          I had a quick look at the letter and its history. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letter_of_Lentulus

          The letter seems very dodgy. It pretends to be from a Roman who never existed, etc. There are many errors and problems with the letter.

          The Jews were involved in a LOT of lying from 430 BC onwards. The Jews FAKED a lot of documents. And some Jews like Josephus were just liars when they needed to be.

          I did publish and article by Emily Henderson about how Jesus came to be seen as white. Jews provided the “evidence”.

          Remember the Bible is about Jews and supposedly from Jews. Jews are non-white. How is it then that suddenly, there is this offshoot of “Israelites” who are joined at the hip to the “Jews”. It makes no sense.

          • 10th August 2018 at 2:06 am

            Hi Jan,

            You make valid points. However, I would like to point out that the so-called “Letter of Lentulus” is distinct from the letter of Pontius Pilate. The Letter of Lentulus very much seems to be a fabrication, as you say; there are many errors and weird things pointed out on Wikipedia and elsewhere. On the other hand, I have seen no such evidence of falsehood or tampering with the letter of Pontius Pilate. The only thing I have seen which raises questions is that the Congressional Library denies the presence of this letter in their archives, although many places claim that it was indeed in the Congressional Library. It seems that they may have removed it or are attempting to censor this letter by lying about it.

            Furthermore, these two letters offer contrasting descriptions of Jesus. The Letter of Lentulus portrays Jesus the way that he is depicted now; with brown hair, a beard, etc. But the letter of Pontius Pilate describes him as “golden-haired” (i.e., blond), tall, and much fairer than the Jews. Sounds more like a white man / Aryan to me!

            You are very right about Jewish fabrication. In fact, Josephus may not even have existed as he is portrayed today. There is a very interesting video about this topic here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emUkL_WP3z8
            It seems that MANY parts of our history have been faked by Jews.

            Nonetheless, none of this negates the fact that Jesus may have been an Aryan. There is much in the way of alternative scientific and historical theories which suggest this to be the case, not just this alleged letter from Pontius Pilate. I would be very interested in discussing this with you via email if you are interested. Some of this is perhaps too controversial or seemingly preposterous for me to place this within view of the public eye.

Leave a Reply to Sheugnet Jones Cancel reply

%d bloggers like this:
Skip to toolbar