So-Called Historical Revisionism about WW2: Don’t use lying Jewish terms…

Just a note: We should NOT really refer to the term "Historical Revisionism" with regard to WW2 and the fake Jewish holocaust, etc, etc.

Its NOT REVISIONISM. ITS TRUTH TELLING FFS! Its the damned Jews who lied about events that never took place.

We mustn’t walk around and skulk around about … this is pathetic revisionist history!

NO! THIS IS THE DAMNED TRUTH! THE GERMANS TOLD THE TRUTH. THIS IS JEWISH NONSENSE AND ENORMOUS JEWISH LIES!

This is not REVISIONISM … THIS IS TRUE HISTORY, REAL HISTORY as David Irving, (a super hero in my view), would say! REAL HISTORY … Not Jewish nonsense history.

One thought on “So-Called Historical Revisionism about WW2: Don’t use lying Jewish terms…

  • 21st October 2019 at 10:19 pm
    Permalink

    David Irving is indeed a superhero. I don’t disagree with you; “revisionism” suggests that we’re the ones who are changing history, when in fact, we’re just telling the truth as you say. Perhaps we could call it “true history” or “corrected history” or “re-examined history”. But yes, too much jargon and lingo is only useful for those of us in the know. Normal people need to understand that we’re not doing anything underhanded or sneaky. However, I will say that “revisionism” is better than the foul term “Holocaust denial”. The latter sounds even worse, implying that it’s a denial of facts when in reality, THEY’re the ones denying the facts!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: