Video: VERY IMPORTANT: Did Simon Roche of the Suidlanders defraud Americans to buy a farm in SA?

Computer Crime

Video
Right-Click here to download the Video

In this video, Melve, Vanessa and Jan are interviewed by Andrew Carrington Hitchcock in the UK about the Suidlanders and Simon Roche. Andrew is a Christian (Christian Identity). Andrew explains why he decided NOT to interview Simon Roche last year. He questions Melve about her and Faith Goldy’s emails to Simon Roche and also questions Vanessa about Simon’s (below the belt) accusations against her.

Melve explains the information she received from multiple sources that Simon Roche used the monies he collected in the USA last year (supposedly for helping whites in a Civil War), and how he used it to buy a farm for himself in South Africa.

It seems as if Simon may have engaged in criminal fraud. Melve suggests that if people believe they were defrauded by Simon Roche, that they should go to their local Police station and open a case for criminal fraud so that the matter can be properly investigated.

Vanessa, explains her contact with the Suidlanders and how she found out they lie so much.

In this video Melve does not mention the amount of money, but according to my sources, the amount is in the region of R2.5 million – which is approximately US$200,000. We do know that American Churches are still donating money to the Suidlanders regularly.

6 thoughts on “Video: VERY IMPORTANT: Did Simon Roche of the Suidlanders defraud Americans to buy a farm in SA?

  • 18th March 2018 at 12:33 pm
    Permalink

    Oh man he duped another person trying to help. Jan please contact this Swedish man,

    Reply
  • 17th March 2018 at 7:49 pm
    Permalink

    i knew it! i was the one sending you early warning email when that roche guy was on all the american alt rigth podcast…it catched my ears when he slipped that he was formely with the communists down there and some other alarming things….i was laughed at but see i was rigth! only you believed me!

    Reply
    • 18th March 2018 at 3:21 pm
      Permalink

      Ragimund. About your point, Stefan Molyneux channel has given him airtime twice in the recent past.

      In the first one, take note who he blames for the plight of SA. He blames the following groups:
      (A) the British for starting Apartheid — (for accuracy: There is a difference between segregation and apartheid, and Vervoerd/Malan etc took credit for being the architects of aparheid)
      (B) The ANC
      (C) Those SA who allowed the ANC into power (the English speaking SA citizen)

      In the second one, Stefan introduces him as a high ranking ANC official, Roche confirms this, then the interview carries on as per normal.

      Its really difficult to take Roche’s argument’s seriously — (using the word very loosely for purposes of conversation)
      His Linkedin profile claims he has (lucrative) government contracts with black governments in the meat business.

      He makes many other contradictions, but just on the issue of the ANC alone its a red flag.
      I don’t care if someone is a member of the ANC or not, the only thing that matters if they have a genuine argument or not.

      In Roche’s case it IS a big deal. Nearly EVERYTHING on his first interview hinges on the ANC being corrupt, evil etc from the day they came into power. From the second interview, Roche is claiming he joined them the day they came into power, or before this. This makes everything in his first interview moot – ALL OF IT.
      Why? because he blames the English SA and Britain for giving them the vote, and that they had evil intentions/or were too stupid. First interview goes on about “being better under apartheid”, etc.. (so he was apartheid until 1994, anti-apartheid from 1994-2018, and then by 2017/2018 became apartheid again).

      Anyone claiming “better under apartheid” is either ignorant or dishonest.
      Even if you ignore the NP activities which received international condemnation, there were still incidents such as necklacing which came from the other side. Ordinary people were the victims of both.
      Forget the NP for a second, forget everything they did wrong. Would anyone in their right mind believe the days of necklacing, Alexandria gang violence etc were much better than today?

      His big argument “its everyone else to blame for supporting the ANC, but the ANC is the biggest issue” one day, and “I was ANC myself, but … *ahem cough* brain-no yogurt vir die nasie, smaak soos ‘n engel het op my tong gepiepie… .sorry about that … where was I again?” (he has a habit of [fill in whatever] change of subject he overdramatizes when uncomfortable issues like this pop up)

      Reply
  • 17th March 2018 at 5:28 am
    Permalink

    Opps he pissed off Mel Ve.. This Simon Roche should be tarred and feathered live on youtube. Vanessa mentioned that he was a French-Jew ? She never elaborated on it. Good show as always. Jan always fighting for his people since forever!

    Reply
    • 18th March 2018 at 8:21 pm
      Permalink

      Simon has angered a lot of people through his deception. Mel Ve put her neck out there for him and his organization and clearly he has betrayed that trust, or he would not have hesitated to disclose his financial accounts. Beyond that, he’s stabbed every American who thought they were helping endangered whites in SA in the back — churches included. The name Roche isn’t English. It isn’t Dutch. It isn’t German via Southwest Africa. That leaves Jewish, and it’s of French extraction. He calls himself a yidophile and has numerous Jewish phenotypes and mannerisms, including a refusal to eat pork, a neurotic smoking habit, and severe mental issues (as seen in those emails!). Jan has done great work in helping to expose Simon, as has Mel, and it was an honor and a privilege to be a part of it.

      Reply
  • 16th March 2018 at 3:07 pm
    Permalink

    The Khoi San are Capoids where the Bantu are Congoloid and whites being Caucasoids. 🙂

    Reply

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: