When armchair Generals say: Hitler and Napoleon made stupid mistakes & deserved to lose…

[I get quite irritated and annoyed when people keep saying: Oh Hitler was a fool and he did this wrong; and Napoleon was a fool and he did that wrong. All these comments come from people with 20/20 hindsight, a bunch of cheap armchair generals who have not got the slightest clue about the incredible feats of arms and unbelievable brilliance of the Germans or the French in their respective world wars.

On Mike Walsh’s website there were comments about an article of his which had this type of attitude. You can read the comments and article here: https://europeansworldwide.wordpress.com/2017/11/24/the-allied-battle-for-bolshevism/comment-page-1/#comment-1815

Below is my response to this. Jan]

There are so many arm-chair generals who like to point out the “obvious” errors of Hitler or Napoleon. I think this is nonsense. Von Manstein himself said in his memoirs that in 1943, there was no reason whatsoever to believe that Germany could still lose the war. Both Napoleon and Hitler were brought down by Jewish-Britain working with Russia (and other countries) to destroy the victory of one European country which brought unity to Europe through force of arms. In BOTH cases, the accused (Napoleon or Hitler) did not actually start the conflict and neither were the first to make any of the moves. In the case of Napoleon, he had to survive SEVERAL “Coalitions” (read: “Allies” organised by Jewish Britain) before he fell. In Hitler’s case, he even had to deal with invasion by another continent (USA).

In both cases, the French and the Germans, fought right to the very end valiantly despite everything. The French even won a battle AFTER Waterloo had been lost. The Germans faced unbelievable overwhelming power and yet were still fighting with incredible tenacity perhaps as late as early 1945 against incredible odds.

Europe is a small continent, and the defeat of Europe is something engineered by bigger forces outside Europe. In both cases Jewish-Britain was a critical role player. Jewish-Britain, for centuries worked to maintain “the balance of power” in Europe so that no one European nation could unite Europe.

That France and Germany, each could put up the fight that they did was astounding.

The incredible amount of help that the communist Soviet Union got during WW2 from the USA and Britain must not be ignored. Something like 5,000 fighter aircraft were flown from the USA directly to the USSR at one point. Compare that to the entire German airforce which had 12,000 aircraft. That was just the aircraft.

The Germans were producing tanks measured at less than 1,000 per month throughout the war whereas Russia was churning out about 20,000 per month. In the final months of the war, the Germans on the Eastern front were outnumbered 12:1.

The Germans, like the French were overwhelmed by production capacity and by empires larger than Europe.

I think it is ridiculous to blame Napoleon or Hitler for either of their defeats. Nobody else would have come to within even a fraction of the sheer fight that both of them managed to put up.

The German army during WW2 killed about 30 million in Russia alone! Now that’s saying something for an army that never numbered more than 3 million.

What you have in all these cases is Jewish globalism, using the powers of EMPIRES across the surface of the earth to crush a small country of whites. Napoleon faced 3 empires: Britain, Russia & Austro-Hungarian. Hitler faced 3 empires: British, Russian and American (we can refer to America as an empire due to it enormous size).

Austerlitz, which Napoleon won, is also known as the Battle of 3 Emperors. Napoleon defeated 2 Emperors in a single day.

The sheer feats of arms of the French and Germans during their respective world wars (which they both were) is almost beyond belief.

I should add that the Spaniards were a European super-power after they kicked the Jews out in 1492 and they were a super-power that actually won and survived for centuries.

I think it is utterly stupid for people to blame Hitler and Napoleon for their final defeats. Their feats of arms were greater than anything the world has seen since the Roman Empire.

Both Hitler and Napoleon did reach out to make peace. But their enemies were implacable and Jewish-Britain kept arranging for others to gang up on them until eventually they were overwhelmed.

4 thoughts on “When armchair Generals say: Hitler and Napoleon made stupid mistakes & deserved to lose…

  • 23rd June 2018 at 7:31 pm
    Permalink

    To nature the only crime is fratricide no matter who does it or who encourages it or who participates in it

    Reply
  • 23rd June 2018 at 6:34 pm
    Permalink

    You’re absolutely correct Jan. Nothing wrong with reviewing history and pointing out mistakes but the key factors for the loss of the war are as you pointed out. Outnumbered….In the protocols and in the speech of Rabbi Rabinovich 1952 (they claim fake ..lol) they state clearly that if one nation catches on to the jew control manipulation and rises up against it that they merely use their media and influence to turn 3 or 4 other nations against it. Continually manipulating us to turn against each other. They boast of this…..It’s a dirty shame that we allow them the control of media in all cases…Next time we must dismantle all their places of power and influence worldwide…..errors were made and the biggest is ever trusting the jew in any nation…the enemy of mankind…..

    Seig Heil!!!
    next time…..soon

    Reply
  • 23rd June 2018 at 3:26 am
    Permalink

    Jan, the point is that both Napoleon and Hitler could have won had they not made serious blunders. It doesnt mean that they were fools ; they erred according to their personalities and beliefs. It doesnt mean they didnt fight well (brilliantly), it simply means they made the key mistakes which brought them down.
    In Napoleon’s case it was the Russian invasion in defiance of all strategic and logistical sense, when he was in a position of unassailable power on the Continent, and had the port facilities to out-build the Royal Navy about 5:1. Had he remained in France (or gone to Spain in person to win the war there) 1812-1813 he would have had an overwhelming ships-of-the-line superiority by 1814 to flood the channel and invade England with ease. Of course once ashore in Britain the Grande Armee would have ground to pieces anything the British could muster against it within a matter of months. Instead these same elite French formations were ground to pieces in the Russian weather extremes, firstly in the summer when most losses were taken (around 200,000) secondly in the two months after Napoleon abandoned the Kaluga road southern route to retreat back along his line of march towards Smolensk, where almost no food or shelter was available ; the dissolution of the veteran core (over 100,000 troops) which proceeded within a fortnight is astonishing, and this a strategic blunder of the highest order.

    Hitler made two profound strategic mistakes.
    The first indeed underlines his humanitas and belief in his own rhetoric ; namely Dunkirk, when he wished to spare the English the loss of several hundred thousand men. But you dont make gestures of this sort in the course of a major war and expect to win. Such gestures are entirely appropriate AFTER you’ve won. The BEF trapped at Dunkirk was the ONLY trained and properly equipped British force anywhere near the home isles in 1940, and with its defeat and capture Britain would have fallen within months if not weeks, initially via airborne landings on the key port and communications facilities and airfields. Once this was accomplished, no bombing war, and no air war that Germany couldnt have won with ease.
    Since air power was the dominant service arm in WW2, Hitler’s other serious mistake was diverting the Me-262 jet fighter into refitting as a fighter bomber in 1943, when the plane first became available for mass production. This aircraft was the clearest and most decisive demonstration of German techno prowess, and undoubtedly a war-winning weapon, on both fronts, in 1943 when Germany still had the necessary pilots. In the event the Americans won the air war , and therefore the war, in the first half of 1944 (from bases in Britain of course — thanks to Dunkirk) using the superiority and numbers of their high performance prop fighters like the mustang, with which they blew the majority and best of the German pilots out of the skies. Without this profound victory the bankster allies could never have launched the Normandy invasion with any hope of success, and never would have. Had the Luftwaffe been given the 262 when it became available, and been allowed to use it appropriately, the Germans would have won the air war.
    In neither case are these hindsight criticisms. They were loudly and rightly decried at the time for the obvious and crippling blunders that they were.

    Reply
    • 24th June 2018 at 6:55 pm
      Permalink

      With respect, you don’t seem to be taking account of the whole situation. Jews had outposts dotted about the world, in caital cities, in amost complete secrecy but with mutual intercommunication. They had enough control on money and the legal frameworks to insist on repayments that they could run up very high debts – for Napoleon, for Churchill, for Americans, AND for Hitler, if you accept the possibility that Hitler was somewhat subservient to Jews; or for that matter entirely. You’re no thinking widely enough. Jews probably wanted Britain to fight, and that meant being bombed so the media could pretend enragement. They didn’t want Britain to lose its empire, until Jews in the US were ready to take it over. The City of London was never bombed. Assuming any speech during WW2 was genuine is a bit naive. And note that Jew archives are never opened. Jews in the USSR were in full contact with British, USA, and German Jews, and must have known orders, deliveries, and stocks of weaponry worldwide. I doubt if Germany could have won in the USSR, versus Jews, who could control ‘Mother Russia’ propaganda, control the Gulags, force Russians to fight (e.g. they were locked into tanks; shot if deserters; had food controlled). You’re completely ignoring Jews as a force, easy to do as they were not in a single country and were in full wartime control of propaganda.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: