Chris Cantwell Show: 2 US Listeners give feedback on Simon Roche of the Suidlanders

I asked people on Gab for feedback of what they thought of Simon Roche on the Cantwell show. One guy wrote this:

He seemed a bit slimy, at best has kids and also when on the job in USA for an “important mission” he is getting side tail. And he didn’t realize the issue with admitting that they are massively infiltrated..so telling me in case things go down I will go with spies to secret place where no one knows and be disarmed…pass.

(By “side tail” he was referring to Roche getting in bed with women on this “critical mission”).

On Twitter, someone else of their own accord came to me and said: I donated $20 to the Suidlanders, but 20 minutes into listening to the show I regretted donating the money.

So there is the first example of an actual donor being unhappy about donating to the Suidlanders.

Chris Cantwell was MASSIVELY on Roche’s side during that interview and it is good to see that there were some people seeing through it.

Simon Roche avoided an interview with Andrew Carrington Hitchcock and myself today. I will be putting the video up this weekend. Also, I will be publishing the 5 questions I wanted to ask Simon Roche on that show. Maybe other whites can ask him those questions on some other date.

11 thoughts on “Chris Cantwell Show: 2 US Listeners give feedback on Simon Roche of the Suidlanders

  • 13th May 2018 at 2:13 pm
    Permalink

    I’m a US listener, and commented the day you posted the interview. I waited a week without the comment being approved. Then I posted a follow up, asking why it was not approved…still nothing.

    Reply
    • 13th May 2018 at 9:39 pm
      Permalink

      I have lots of unapproved comments. Its not very high on my list. I get round to it when I can. Currently I’m sitting with over 700 unapproved comments on my website.

      Reply
  • 25th April 2018 at 6:23 pm
    Permalink

    Until your interview, I wanted to like Christopher Cantwell, now I am noticing all sorts of things about him that I really did not want to look at. For example, he changes the subject every time a caller “names the Jew.”

    Alas, his “Interview” with you was NOT fair and balanced. Cantwell seemed to be a Roche supporter.

    Jan, in one of your older YouTube videos you explained that (((THEY))) know that I am their enemy way before I realize it which is the story of my life. It is so clear to me now, but I did not see it until you spoke those words in the excellent videos you made.

    You also provided an old German video that showed the facial characteristics of Jews which opened my eyes further, just like in the movie “They Live.”

    (((They))) could tell I was their racial enemy by looking at my eyes, nose, and other facial features.

    Thanks to your efforts, I can now see (((Them))).

    Roche’s nose and the closeness of his eyes looks Jewish. And his behavior serves (((Them))).

    So, “if it looks like a duck and walks like a duck…….”

    If my memory serves, Roche claims to be of Irish Catholic background.

    There was a Catholic Priest call “Malachi” who destroyed the Church by changing the Vatican policy that protected White Families. He was a Spanish Jew living in Ireland who claimed to be Irish.

    Ireland has been the playground of these devils for centuries.

    As an Irishman, I can tell you that too many of the cowardly Irish fled American cities to live in the suburbs as Roche suggests. These Irish cowards developed a form of Stockholm syndrome where they now embrace the culture and behavior of their enemies.

    Yes, these cowardly Irish look White and live in fine clean homes. There is no garbage and Piss/ Shit on their streets or in their neighborhoods. These Suburban Irish are still White after all. But, that is just on the surface. And it is just a form of surface paint to cover up the rot below.

    What I am trying to explain Jan, is that a watered down version of Roches’ plan has been done before in my lifetime in the USA and in the long run it is the worst thing our Folk can do.

    Here is a YouTube video that does a nice job of explaining the current situation in Ireland:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fUr7FC9Hs_w

    Here is a book that I am going to read soon that is promising and gives me some hope that there are more Irishmen like me:

    Biologist by training, journalist and author by vocation, Tomás Mac Síomóin takes a provocative look at 21st century Irish society with “The Broken Harp”. Using the insights of modern biology, social psychology, sociolinguistics and historical analysis he explains contemporary Irishness in terms that are both original and compelling.

    Reply
    • 13th May 2018 at 9:45 pm
      Permalink

      Hi Paddy,
      Thank you for this really interesting feedback. A very interesting post.

      Reply
    • 13th May 2018 at 9:46 pm
      Permalink

      BTW Patrick, Cantwell did not impress me. He was shutting up everyone saying the word Jew – he was shutting them up real fast!
      And it was clear he is a 100% Roche supporter!

      Reply
  • 21st April 2018 at 8:22 pm
    Permalink

    a forgotten part of the story about the last roche visit to the US …he fucking girls left and rigth and one of them(dont remember her but her story are on youtube) claim that he was figthing we his fellow sidekick scammer and that he left letting Roche alone.

    that guy was telling everyone he was formely in rhodesian commando back in the day…this woman he was fuckin reached out to people who were formely in such military service they looked him up o the list and he never was in the special force he wasnt even in the military EVER

    also of the record Roche and his sidekick were saying to gullible american scum that they needed volunteers to go in africa to figth a war…thats crazy talk and can only end with people dead and/or tortured in jail.

    not that i pity any anglos scum stupid enough to go but that still massively dishonest and crazy. this Roche guy is an intelligence asset and will get people listed and arrested, youve got to be blind not to see it. But many americans love him and will defend him because he know how to dig into their superiority complex.

    but ho well it seem direct withness of all hat plus all the proove that he was involved in white killing negro communist party and he live with high level people of the actual govt he claim to defend ‘his’ people against aint enough,

    well for people that love him so much just go ahead give all the money you want to him and go join his secret army, get arrested for terrorism and jailed… what can anyone say to you, you just love it that much,

    good luck in african jail pals!

    Reply
    • 21st April 2018 at 11:14 pm
      Permalink

      Well, I didn’t gather my information by watching a video starring Roche’s angry ex-fuckbuddy, but I am what you refer to as American scum who actually attended one of Roche’s presentations. No Roche women attended that meeting, he didn’t claim to be a former commando or ex-military, he didn’t solicit volunteers to go fight in South Africa, and he didn’t even come out and ask for donations although I have little doubt that he would have accepted them. He presented a lot of disturbing information related to farm murders and the plight of white people in South Africa. He explained how he had opposed Apartheid and his involvement with the ANC and the nature of his work. However, he was careful not to cover certain subjects in anticipation of returning to South Africa, and he certainly didn’t suggest anything that could be construed as insurrection. It is almost humorous when I read of various groups and individuals who through diligent sleuthing believe that they have uncovered hidden dirt on Roche when all they needed to do was attend one of his presentations to hear it directly from Roche. I have not read of a single revelation by any of these groups that wasn’t covered in Roche’s presentation. It might be fair to say that Roche appears to be motivated by a desire to protect white people rather than a hatred of black people. My guess is that he would agree that the ANC is corrupt and has been a failure, but I doubt that he would support a reinstatement of Apartheid. It seems very clear that he is concerned about the future of white people in South Africa. But heck, I might change my mind if I watched the ex-fuckbuddy video rather than rely on what I saw and heard with my own eyes and ears.

      Reply
    • 13th May 2018 at 9:37 pm
      Permalink

      Hi Ragimund, thanks for this info. I’m behind on comments.

      Reply
  • 20th April 2018 at 5:22 am
    Permalink

    I may have heard this wrong. But did Simon say that he resides at the same address as a relative of Cyril Ramaphosa. If this is the case, I would be very concerned. Also having been associated with the ANC is unforgiveable.

    Reply
    • 21st April 2018 at 12:59 pm
      Permalink

      Yes Roche said he lived at the same address as the niece of President Ramaphosa. If you listened carefully, you’d see he knows their names well. Notice also his black pronunciation of their names EXACTLY (something most whites here can’t/don’t care to do). He also had business dealings with them. Note: This information was discovered by the Americans who wrote about Roche and the Suidlanders and AS SHOULD BE OBVIOUS IT WAS ALL TRUE! When those addresses and names were read by Cantwell, Roche did not DENY any of it. He in fact confirmed its truth. So that shows you the Americans were dead accurate in their information that they published about Roche – information that has never before seen the light of day. Roche accepted the truth of everything and even added more to it.

      Reply
    • 13th May 2018 at 9:36 pm
      Permalink

      Yes he did say that. He said he resided at the home of Ramaphosa’s niece.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: