S.Africa: Farm Murders: Black University graduate investigates who is behind White Farm Murders

[This is the first time I’ve come across such an investigation by a black. It makes for very interesting reading. His information is gleaned directly from the white victims. What I would say is that one must be careful of how much value to place on all the statements of the black attackers. e.g. use of children. The key issue here is: INSIDE JOB. These attacks are driven by blacks who know the place. Some of this info cannot be gleaned by using children.

Note: In the Rhodesian Bush war children were excellent spies for the black terrorists and the black kids were out scouting and reporting on movements of the Rhodesian army. So the concept is valid up to a point. But that can’t get them inside the houses and to know things inside. This can only come from blacks working for whites.

The Police “fail” the white farmers. Do they fail them due to their own incompetence or because they agree with the attackers and don’t really want to do anything? My suspicion is always the latter.

The “Liberal solution” proposed: Get Govt involved, get NGO’s involved, etc – a typical Liberal solution of the kind that the Liberals and Jews propose is a total waste of time. The real answer is: Revive the Commando structure – farmers must have their own units whereby they protect themselves.

Otherwise, I agree with all the other conclusions herein. These are military attacks. Also the Kingpins – why aren’t they caught? Why are so few farm murderers actually caught? I really think behind this are BLACK POLITICIANS FUNDING THIS perhaps even as a secret Govt operation run by our own military. The involvement of Zimbabweans, and Zimbabweans with military expertise playing the leading role has led me to think that Farm attacks are a TOP SECRET PROJECT run jointly by the Govt/Military of South Africa and Zimbabwe (and Mocambique too) – because some Mocambicans have been involved. All 3 ruling parties are black communist one party states. The ANC is a one party state. Go and see how hard it will be to get rid of them. Zimbabwe and Mocambique and Angola and Namibia are ALL still ruled by the same communist party that took over from the whites. Democracy is a myth. These are white-hating black communists who hide under a veil of appearing to be “Liberals”. That’s what I warned about in my book Government by deception which I published in 2001. You can view Government by Deception HERE. Jan]

Cristopher Gumbi.

Farm attacks – an evil within

Claims of kingpins in charge of well-planned crime operations with connections in government, highly trained hit squads using children to secure intelligence in farm attacks, occasional acts of intimidation to force land owners off their property and inhuman physical trauma inflicted on victims of such heinous crimes speak of the evil that characterises incidents committed against inhabitants of some of the remotest locations in South Africa.

Limpopo is no exception and when embarking on research into farm attacks University of Limpopo (UL) research assistant Cristopher Gumbi couldn’t possibly have been prepared for unearthing the sorrow bottled up in recollections of physical trauma shared by victims of such crimes. Shedding tears with survivors as they revisited the horrors of the past, he got a glimpse of a form of crime that threatens food security and, in turn, the economy of the country.

His findings were consolidated in a 117-page thesis for a Master of Arts degree from the Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice at UL, which he obtained in September this year. Gumbi’s investigation of the motivational factors for farm attacks and its consequential injurious phenomena looks into such crimes committed in parts of Limpopo and Mpumalanga between 2005 and 2015, bringing him into contact with 23 individuals and groupings who have all been survivors.

Before getting started with the interview Gumbi pointed at his predominantly monotone outfit in solidarity with scores of South Africans commemorating Black Monday, the countrywide action commemorating lives lost in farm attacks and survivors thereof.

From the study the reader gets varying perspectives of the situation as Gumbi delves into a decade of attacks through conversations with survivors from both genders, who varied in age from 38 to 88 years.

Harrowing accounts made him question, among others, the need for inflicting physical trauma upon victims during the orchestration of attacks, he remarked during the interview. “The violent nature of attacks is amply demonstrated by such actions as beatings, tying victims down with cable ties, threats of burning victims with hot water or poisoning them and shooting at first sight,” he notes in his study.

Without exception all respondents stated that attacks which occurred on their farms were well-planned, mentions Gumbi. “There is a clear indication that attackers conduct thorough surveillance of their target and surroundings before they pounce. This shows the high amount of intelligence and patience they put in, in making sure their plan succeeds.” He quotes a victim who stated that the assailants were picked-up by a vehicle after the attack. “This confirms the idea of a hit squad and a getaway car as a form of organised attack,” he states.

He further writes that all of the surviving victims mentioned that the attacks against them were linked to a crime syndicate, with the chief aim of robbing farmers of their money, valuables and weapons in order to fund their operations. In one instance he quotes a victim saying “One of the attackers informed my son that he is part of a crime syndicate and that they cannot remain in custody… These cell groups have kingpins in every town who use kids for stealing because the kids cannot be prosecuted… This is a well-planned operation involving Police, public prosecutors, judges, magistrates to high ranking officials of the government…”

Attackers with military training

Some of the victims maintained the belief that their attackers were a mix of South African and Zimbabwean with military training, according to the information contained in the study. In one incident a victim recalled that the attackers collected all spent cartridges on the scene. In another attack the assailants allegedly ran more than 4 km while carrying rifles to their getaway vehicle and changed clothes in order for them not to be recognised. Gumbi reaches the conclusion that an attack on a farmstead from four sides during one such incident, which resulted in the farmer being shot in the head, indicated a form of formal training on the part of the assailants.

In 47% of the cases money and jewellery were not targeted while 65% of the respondents stated that their attackers were not very interested in other items but their weapons. What the researcher had established though, was that attackers always knew the arrangement of the targeted farmsteads, where the safes were and the weapons kept. It led to the inference that the attacks should have been orchestrated with the help of insiders, who allegedly included teens living on farms.

Attacks believed to be form of intimidation

According to Gumbi’s research 78% of the respondents who reported farm attacks related a form of intimidation, aimed at driving farmers off their land. A female victim informed him that she had believed the attack on her farm was a form of intimidation, because the attackers never stole anything but just started firing through the windows of the house without prior warning. “More than 60 shots were fired. My husband shot back with a .38 revolver. He (name withheld) tossed (the) phone to me to call for help. They shot him (name withheld) in the head. They never came inside. The attackers shouted that they will kill all…”

A farmer who reported that he was attacked by twelve men informed the researcher that one drew a gun and started shooting. “When asked what their primary objective of attacking the farm was, they responded that it was not about cattle, money, guns or jewellery, but about taking control of the farm.”

Thirty-nine per cent of the respondents stated that they knew the attackers. A respondent who was attacked twice, in 2007 and 2014, said his wife knew one of the attackers because she recognised his voice during the initial attack.

Gumbi quoted survivors who were asked whether farms with poor security were singled out for attacks as saying “Poor security is not a contributing factor; it is all about brutal revenge and financial purposes” and “I don’t think poor security is the point here. These attacks are orchestrated by some leader somewhere who wants to drive farmers off their land.”

Gumbi further remarks that farmers do not feel that they are receiving the necessary service delivery from the South African Police Service. From the responses it is clear that the Police are not doing enough to assist the farmers during and after an attack, he writes. “Negligence and dereliction of duties are evident from the responses of respondents. Serious allegations concerning negligence with firearms raise concerns.”

Farm attacks need to be addressed holistically hence, the researcher concedes, more role players such as all government departments and non-profit organisations need to play a more active role in improving security on farms to protect food security.

Gumbi points out that unless security on farms is made a national priority, farm attacks will continue to increase. He recommends that it gets prioritised and discussed as part of South Africa’s national agenda, particularly in Parliament. He also recommends that racial stereotypes in farming urgently get addressed. “The South African justice system needs to recognise farm attacks as a criminal charge of its own with a strict mandatory minimum sentence applied; this will serve as a form of deterrence to attackers.”

Gumbi expresses great concern over farm attacks in South Africa not being given the necessary attention by the government, considering the effects such crimes have on the economy and the well-being of victims, families and communities.

According to him South Africa has the responsibility to view farm attacks as a violation of human rights and a threat to the country’s economy and food security. “The rural farming community contributes substantially to the growth and development of the South African economy.”

Source: http://www.observer.co.za/farm-attacks-an-evil-within/

One thought on “S.Africa: Farm Murders: Black University graduate investigates who is behind White Farm Murders

  • 9th December 2017 at 3:50 am
    Permalink

    white people will, quite simply, have to give up on their “law abiding” BULL-shite ‘tudes and start BREAKING the FUCKING LAW…..part. when it comes to gun laws….that means either “illegally” importing them, “stealing” them or making them in back-yard work-shops….. they may need to ‘threaten’ gun shop owners so that they can ‘burglarise’ gun stores or sporting-goods stores…..
    when it comes to racial survival, all bets are off!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: